INDIA DON’T BE AFRAID OF BEING OFFICIALLY A HINDU
RASHTRA, GET READY TO TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY.
It is the most favourable agenda of any anti-India any anti-Hindu forces to try and sell the narrative that Narendra Modi for the BJP wants to make India as a Hindu state if that is so what is wrong about India being The Hindu state or rashtra I wonder?
It is the most favourable agenda of any anti-India any anti-Hindu forces to try and sell the narrative that Narendra Modi for the BJP wants to make India as a Hindu state if that is so what is wrong about India being The Hindu state or rashtra I wonder?
Our Bhartiya
civilization is older than thousands of year or rather I should say it is older
than the known history. History worldwide has been captured and narrated only,
by a handful. Those who wanted to fix Abrahamic agenda. No one can
introduce the concept of “WHY INDIA should be A HINDU RASHTRA” to Hindus as 95%
of the word Hindu population lives in India, not to forget that this is the
birthplace are “Santana Hindu dharma”.
The present geo-political
state of India should never be shy of recognising her identity as the mother
land of Hinduism and the Hindu way of life.
Hinduism or Santana
Dharma is the third largest religious practice in the world after Christianity
and Islam. But due to its nature It is not geo politically as widespread on the
world map as the other two. India Nepal and Mauritius are the three countries
where 97% of the Hindu population of the World lives. (not taking into account
the various migrations that happened from India to other parts of the world
people who are now known as people of Indian Origin). when we talk we cannot
discount the fact that 95% of the population who follow Hinduism live in the
Indian state and only about 1.5% to 1.7% of Muslims live in in Arabia
the birthplace of Islam.
Let's now move
to a little more focused talks.
The liberals or as I
call them "Secularism Industry" and its promoters have no
problems with 53 Muslim dominated countries out of which Islam happens to be
the official religion in over 26 of them and about 100+ Christian dominated
countries of which 15 Nation have Christianity as its official religion.
Countries like England,
Greece, Iceland, Norway, Hungary, Denmark are pronounced Christian countries
and we also have about 6 countries which have Buddhist states, Israel being the
only Jewish state. But when it comes to India! suddenly all rational are
forgotten. Why Hinduism cannot be the official religion of Geo-Political
Indian state?
A religion which
preaches the philosophy of peace through this mantra:
Om Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah। Sarve Santu
Nir-Aamayaah।
Sarve Bhadraanni Pashyantu।Maa Kashcid-Duhkha-Bhaag-Bhavet॥
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih॥
Sarve Bhadraanni Pashyantu।Maa Kashcid-Duhkha-Bhaag-Bhavet॥
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih॥
Which translates
to :
May All Be Prosperous and Happy. May All
Be Free from Illness
May All See What Is Spiritually Uplifting. May No One Suffer In Any Way. Om Peace, Peace, Peace..
May All See What Is Spiritually Uplifting. May No One Suffer In Any Way. Om Peace, Peace, Peace..
Can never be a cause of
danger or in treating other religion with dignity. The Hindu dharma also has
multiple sect in its own self, we have Jain’s, Buddhist Sikh, Arya Samaj, and
numerous other sects... and even when the land was distributed in smaller
kingdoms which were predominantly Hindu state. We had a flourishing Paris, Zoroastrian,
Muslim, Christian subject in their estates.
Next time around
whenever you go to any religious place other than that of Hindus, notice you
would find a lot of people who are people of Indian Origin and are practicing
Islam and Christianity.
Proselytizing was never
a concept that the Hindu or the Santana Dharma
ever accepted throughout its history. But on the contrary religions such as Islam
and Christianity both used proselytization as a policy for existence and
expansion.
Interestingly there are
Christian and Muslim Nations across who raise voice on human right abuse and
religious persecution of Muslims and Christians throughout the world.
Interestingly they will have numerous discussions on Myanmar Palestine Yamen
but conveniently forget the pain and loss that Hindus (including Sikhs,
Jains & Buddhist) suffered during partition era, in Pakistan, in
Afghanistan and Bangladesh. the most interesting case happens to be that
this class of people would stand up to fight for rohingya people who illegally
migrated to Jammu region of India. They will not utter a word for the brutality
faced by the Kashmiri pundits nor for the ethnic cleansing that
happened in Kashmir, by the fanatic Wahhabi Islamist. They will fund,
propagate, give financial moral and tactical support to protest about the controversial
disputed Babari structure, Inhuman practice of triple talaq,
abrogation of article 370 or a matter of foreign policy as Citizenship
amendment act. But will not have guts to talk about the Hindu temples
gurdwaras which are desecrated / demolished in Pakistan, Afghanistan,
Bangladesh. who will forget the destruction of Hindu temple in Baluchistan,
Sindh or Muscat?
Most political
identities/ families or people who have been into politics claiming to be saviours
of secular credentials have never been secular. They have always
practiced anti-Hindu politics. It could be on the name of
secularism or on the name of creating cast divide or for the matter the north
south divide but it has always been purely an anti-Hindu politics. In
2007-08 The question on religious expenditure and subsidies provided by
exchequer was put up before the Honourable supreme court of India and the Hon. Supreme
court gave directions asking how can a state which has secularism placed in its
preamble, give subsidies on ground of religion? It further passed orders
asking the union government of India to implement phasing out of the Haj
subsidy which was provided to millions at an average of $1,000 per
person. But then in our country this is what is known as secularism, but in
true sense it is religious minority based appeasement politics. To
your utter surprise countries which pronounced “Idol worship as condemned”
(Hindus, Jains Buddhist, Cristian’s do worship idols) are being benefited by
Indian taxpayers of which mostly are Hindus, by way of religious tourism.
The same money which is given for religious tourism, comes back to India in
form of support and expansion of Wahhabi extremism. Pushing a section of
Indians towards intolerance and disregard of the Constitution of India.
As per my
understanding, if a nation is secular in nature and that its
Constitution does not have a religion, then why would it have religion
specific laws?
If secularism is the ethos
and soul of our constitution, then the constitution should have Uniform
Civil laws. In other word uniform codes to conduct for all subject of
the state.
I still fail to
understand how and why? with what mind have we been governed by various
governments and bureaucratic machinery till now. Where one set of religious
institutions are pronounced to be autonomous in nature and operation,
because they are called minority Institutions (places of religious practice,
shrines or educational institutions). But at the same time most of the
prominent Hindu shrines and temples are under the control of Government. Where
is the ethos of equality and Sovereignty of Hindu in this pseudo secular
Nation?
The Hindus and the
Santana dharma has not only coexisted with religions that plagiaristic
out of Hinduism but also have given ample freedom to persons practicing
them, when they were religious persecuted around the world, they found refuge
in bharat. Not just these but when people prominent religion faced persecution
for example, Syrian Christians who came over about 1800 years ago, none of them
have vanished in my bharat.
There are some people
who do feel ashamed and who take it as disgrace being told that they are
Hindus, that they are from the soil which has given birth to Hinduism.
It is about time to
look back, track facts and origins of your Hinduism, feel pride in being a
Hindu and not shy away anymore...
I very strongly
feel that bharat as a nation is secular by its soul. It is not secular, because
a family which had imposed emergency and put the word secular in our
constitution. This was a time when the entire political opposition of the
country was behind bars. When anybody who question this feudal empire was
attacked, jailed or at times even murdered for asking questions. It is so
because the majority of humanity living in this land are Hindus and the very
nature of this religion is that ensures the secular practices can continue
unquestioned!
Must not forget what
happened to Iran after the revolution or for that matter Afghanistan after that
dethroned the king and proclaimed itself to be Islamic states.
At times I also wonder!
what are these people, who actually say that they are proud that we are a
secular state, knowing well that it was in the darkest period of Indian
democracy, THE EMERGENSY ERA that the 42nd amendment brought the word secular
it into the preamble?
What do they
intend to say?
Those great leaders who
sat in the constituent assembly of India. Framing our constitution were not
secular in nature and actions?
From our first
president Dr Rupendra Prasad or Mahatma Gandhi or Jawaharlal Nehru or Doctor
bheem rao Ambedkar and other such great names were they all communal?
When you feel alienated,
when you feel lonely, when you are persecuted the one person that you always
want to run back to is your mother. If that is not wrong, then giving the
lap of mother to all those who originated from India and are persecuted because
of being religious minority. Why should they not be having the comfort, love
and care of the motherland! The place where their religion originated?
A noted Indian Muslim poet
(awarded poet) goes on to comment, that this Nation has about 35 crore humans
and 100 crore animals (Hindus would be about 100 crores in India). but
that acclaimed poet whom I would only call a hate monger buffoon, forgot that one
he is not an Arab nor he is a descendant of an Arab, he basically is nothing
except, offspring of a frightened Hindu who was weak and could not fight the oppressors
that could be the Wahhabi Mughal or Arab Looters. Who came to India with a
dressier to loot bharat and rule it by barbarism and forceful religious
conversions.
It is said that Islam
came into existence about 1400 years ago. Well my question to all of
those in India practicing Islam is, that before 1400 years, your ancestors
would have been following / practicing some religion. have you ever
wondered, what it was?
My religion, my
Hinduism, my Santana Dharma, gives me the power to accept that one of my
siblings (by DNA) may not be practicing the same path to God that I may be
practicing. But I am happy that he is following some path to attain
enlightenment and to reach Almighty God.
If we declare ourselves
to be a Hindu rashtra it will definitely open doors for safeguarding the
majority population against the force conversion and proselytization mechanism
followed by minorities and to satisfy them the appeasement politics
done by people with vested interest.
India that is Bharat
will remain a progressive state only till such time that the Hindu population
is in domination, in the demographics of this Nation.
Hinduism and secularism
are two sides off of a coin, something like what was there in the
film Sholay, you toss it, in either way you win.
If India happens to
declare itself a Hindu rashtra it would be one of the best things that would
happen. Uniform Civil Code or equality for all and appeasement of none
will become a way of life that means all Indians will be equal regardless of
caste, Creed and religion. A state that is governed by the rule of
law and has equal rights and duties for all its subject will always grow and be
prosper. Countries like Japan, Germany or USA, they are all operated governed
on the principle of rule of law. If the law gives you freedom of
practicing religion of your choice, then enjoy it. But because some Hindus had
been proselytized in history and that has to continue, should not be
tolerated anymore.
If a citizen out of his
free will after reading and understanding any religion wants to denounced the religion
by birth and adopt a new one it is not a sin. But forcing a conversion or
tempting somebody to convert his religion for money, food or education, it is
not something which a progressive society should accept.
I am sure you will not
be able to show me another religion that could recognise and except non
practitioners of their own faith with such regard and humility.
Religious tolerance,
secularism and you live your way and let me live my way, has been the way of
life ever since Hinduism started even much before the Muslims invaded or later
the Europeans came to loot.
When you read history
in contemporary syllabus or the historians that the academician have referred
to in the last century, you will never find them talking about the fact, that
from around year 1080 turnaround 1739 this land of Bharat was invaded by
looters and barbarians for centuries. Buy rough estimate this invasion,
destruction, barbarism would have taken life of over 100 million Hindus.
This perhaps would be the longest and the biggest Holocaust ethnic
cleansing, loot, Murder, barbarism ever in the history of humankind.
There is a creed of humans
who have made it their business making sure that the word Islamophobia
is understood to be a global phenomenon, that people from Islamic world are
facing today. If that is the case then how is it that the population
demography of people following Islam is the fastest expanding phenomena in the
world?
Some people have made
it a business to ruin the image of Hinduism, giving it name like Saffron
terror. By telling word that Hinduism is dangerous and creating sentiment
of Hindu-phobia.
Thousands of year back,
when societies and humanity had more tolerance, minorities, survived and flourished.
So much so that religious demography of specific areas completely overturned,
still the idea of coexistence was not lost, people were not afraid.
That my friends are what the philosophy of Hindu rashtra is, no human is small, all humans will be helped to grow as humans.
Religion is and shall be your personal scope of connectivity with Almighty.
I always say that we
Hindus should take pride in a vibrant and glorious history. That you can
find temple of Sun and fire in distant places like Central Russia with Sanskrit
slokas inscribed. The fact that one of the most densely populated nation,
practicing Islam is Indonesia its Airlines is named Garuda which we all
know was the vahan of Bhagwan Vishnu. Not just that Thailand calls its
king Rama and the palace as Ajodhya, to the extent that has the
scene of Samudra Manthan at its airport. don't forget the
beautiful temples in Cambodia or the one in Burma.
From being present in
so many places on this earth (now limited to only India) Hindus have
never gone about invading anybody for conversion of religion. We have always been
and shall always be tolerant.
It does not mean that by accepting that you are Hindu rashtra you could probably become proselytizing race.
